In partnership with

Now, without any further delay, here is a free copy of Summary Sunday. I hope you find it as engaging, informative and fun a read as I did :)

P.S. I will be having surgery on Tuesday, so Summary Sunday will be a free teaser for the next few weeks while I recover. Consider joining if you like the writing! Also, feel free to reply back to this email with your thoughts!

Summary Sunday:

This week, Prime Minister Keir Starmer and President Emmanuel Macron of France dramatically announced, in front of the world’s media, that they will soon be recognising the state of Palestine, sometime in September. It is clear that after twenty months of genocide that these noble men of noble lineage representing the great democracies of the world will now stand up for justice and will defend the Palestinian people against their brutal Israeli occupiers. It is absolutely wonderful to see these two noble men working together based upon the principles of fairness and justice… and if you believe that, then it is proof that the Age of Innocence is not yet over.

Table of Contents

1. Summary Sunday:

   1. What is the real relationship between Israel and t …

   2. What do the Crusades tell us about what is happeni …

   3. Why are Western leaders so obsessed with Jerusalem …

   4. Now that Israel has been set up, what are they “of …

   5. The Bottom Line: Will Britain and in France recogn …

What is the real relationship between Israel and the Western Alliance?

The unique relationship between the United States, Britain, France and Israel cannot be understood without understanding both history and context. While most news networks in Britain and the United States don’t even give viewers the context going back ten years, we here at The Resistance will blast it way back a thousand years so you can finally put the current Arab-Israeli Conflict into its most fitting context. In order to understand the now of the region, we must be able to grasp the nature of the Crusades of the Middle Ages, and by extension, what those wars tell us about Western attitudes towards the Orient, in particular the Arab and Islamic world. While it is very difficult to cover a thousand years of history in one article, we will do what we can here for those who do not understand the Crusades do not understand the current genocide that we are witnessing in Palestine.

People might ask: what are you talking about? The Crusades started in 1095, when Pope Urban called for a unified European attack on the Islamic world, in particular Jerusalem, and they officially ended in 1291, after several failed attempts to recapture the Holy City of Jerusalem. So what is with you Muzzies? Always digging up the past along with your Sharon Law! 

Whist my EDL neighbour might be right from a technical point of view, the matter can actually be summarised as follows, whether you choose to accept it or not. In response to the Islamic expansions following the death of the Prophet Muhammad, Pope Urban II saw Islam not just as a threat to the Vatican’s political and economic power in the world but also as a threat to the Christian faith itself and to the Western worldview. During speeches, Urban did mention, of course, that the Qur’an declares Jesus to be The Messiah and names a chapter after his blessed mother, Mary (or Maryam in Islam’s holy book.) 

So, the First Crusade was launched in 1095 at the Council of Claremont and ended with the European capture of Jerusalem in 1099. One should keep in mind that Rome is over 4000 kilometres away from the Holy City just as today, Washington is nearly 9,400 kilometres away from Jerusalem. Putting that to one side for now, tens of thousands of innocent people were killed between the call of Urban II to attack Jerusalem in 1095 and the attack itself in 1099. Christians marching from England, Germany and France killed between 5,000 and 10,000 Jews on their way to the Middle East (as punishment for being Christ-killers) and also killed thousands of fellow Christians, as punishment for being from different sects. According to most historians, at least 20,000 were killed during the First Crusade while a group of academics regard this a gross underestimation. Christians entered Jerusalem and spilled so much blood that one historian said “the horses were walking knee-high in blood.” For the next 79 years, the Crusader state became (like Israel today) a military outpost of the West slap-bang in the middle of the Islamic world.

The equivalent would be an Islamic state in Paris or London today.

After decades of corruption and disunity, the Muslim commander Salah-ad-Din (dubbed ‘Saladin’ by Western historians) gathered an Islamic army later and defeated the Crusaders at the Battle of Hattin in 1178. This led to the recapture of Jerusalem in the name of Islam and on the day of his dramatic arrival into what the Muslims call ‘Al-Quds,’ Salah-ad-Din famously declared an amnesty, saying that all Muslims, Christians and Jews were able to pray as they wished and that none of their holy places could be confiscated or desecrated.

This extraordinary act of generosity, in a medieval time of vengeance and blood libels, instantly made him the most the most famous Muslim of his era, and this position is honoured by symbols today in the armies of the Arab world where, for example, Egyptian soldiers carry upon their chests the black and gold logo entitled “The Eagle of Saladin.” In more modern times, Salah-ad-Din, of course, has been honoured in movies such as Ridley Scott’s 2005 movie, ‘Kingdom of Heaven,’ in which the Kurdish-born Sultan is elegantly portrayed by Ghassan Massoud, the rugged Syrian actor and director. In a rare Hollywood move, a Muslim is put across in an extremely favourable light. Although with Saladin, due to his well-known chivalry and willingness to respect the faiths of other people, even after those communities had massacred Muslims in their thousands, it was difficult to portray him as anything but noble.

Following the victory, King Richard I, known as Richard the Lionheart, then attempted to recapture Jerusalem from Saladin in the Third Crusade, which began in May 1189 and ended in September 1192. Richard attempted to return the holy city to Christian hands through a variety of means: diplomacy, a series of bizarre letters to Salah-ad-Din himself, and an unlikely marriage proposal to a relative of Saladin. These all failed so Richard attempted conquest by military means. All of these were unsuccessful and the Muslims held on to Jerusalem until 1967 when it was captured by the Israeli Army, led by General Moshe Dayan. 

What do the Crusades tell us about what is happening today in Palestine?

The state-controlled BBC, the Zionist CNN and the Murdoch-owned Sky News will not tell you this but we will. The Adam Bomb of Truth that we are going to drop on you today is this: after many centuries of fighting Muslims, the Western intelligentsia eventually realised that the Islamic world cannot easily be defeated through conventional warfare. They did not want to fight the Muslims directly anymore for Jerusalem had been in Muslim hands for over nine hundred years by the time of the First World War. So, given their desire to dominate the oil-rich region, the West needed another way of continuing the Crusades in a more “creative” way.

While the West has made the words “jihad” and “terrorism” synonymous in the modern age, within Muslim societies, “jihad” is a far more noble and spiritual concept, namely that the men are expected to fight to defend their communities in the event of invasion. Muslim boys are taught from an early age that killing civilians is wrong but defending your families is an obligation even if it means that your life will be in danger. Because of this spirit of willing to put your life on the line for your people, Western leaders realised that the Muslims were too tough a nut to crack. The thinkers in London, Paris and Washington still wanted to crack it but would prefer it if somebody else went over there to the Middle East and put themselves in the firing line: enter stage left, the Zionist movement. So this way, the West could “manage” the subjugation of the Islamic world but would have plausible deniability in the event of assassination, massacres or open starvation of communities. 

Memorise this sentence which encapsulates everything that is happening here:

Israel exists so that Zionist Jews can do what the West would like to do. 

Hence the Rothschild-backed Balfour Declaration in 1917 which involved one people (the British government) guaranteeing the land of a second people (indigenous Palestinians) to a third people (European Jews.)

After World War I ended in November 1918, the victors - Britain and France - began to surreptitiously carve up huge swathes of land all over the world including the resource-rich Middle East where hundreds of billions of pounds of oil and gas were to be found under its 13,000 square kilometres. London and Paris soon took over former Ottoman Empire lands and concocted the Sykes-Picot Agreement which sliced up Muslim nations into smaller, more manageable pieces: bite-sized chunks if you will. The Ottoman Islamic Empire was officially dismantled in 1924, perhaps the darkest day in the history of the Islamic world since the death of the Prophet himself.

Now, are you sitting down?

This part is important.

Upon victory, the British general Edmund Allenby entered Jerusalem through the Jaffa Gate and declared: “The wars of the Crusades are now over!”

In other words, they never ended.

The Western establishment, Western governments and mainstream media were cunning enough to simply stop using the word ‘Crusade.’

That is all.

They still have not ended.

If a rose by any other name were just as sweet-smelling, then a war by another name is still as blood-soaked.

Why are Western leaders so obsessed with Jerusalem when it is thousands of miles away?

Despite what they say in public, Western leaders – Christian, Jewish or atheist – still have the same baffling, mysterious and obsessive relationship with the city of Jerusalem, a city thousands of miles away on another continent, as was the case during the time of the “official” Crusades. Despite it being illegally occupied territory according to every current international law, it has been recognised as the ‘eternal capital of Israel’ by several nations including the United States, which has been led by Zionist-Christians for almost the entirety of the modern era. These Christians believe that it is part of their religion to support the Israeli state that bans the preaching of Christianity and teaches the Talmud in its schools, the Talmud being a book which describes Mary as a ‘harlot’ and informs the reader that Jesus is ‘in Hell in boiling hot excrement’ and is urging the world, to ‘above all, praise the Jew.’

The relationship between Western leaders and Jerusalem is perhaps the most peculiar relationship that any political group has had with any one city through human history. The reasons for the infatuation with the Holy City is up for debate.

Firstly, some people will say that these are Christians who love the city of Christ.

Secondly, other thinkers will point out that many Western leaders, ostensibly Christian or Jewish, are actually high-ranking Freemasons who are completely obsessed with the city of Hiram Abiff, who is known as The Master Builder in Freemasonic mythology.

A third group may argue that Jerusalem is the centre of the Middle East, a land rich with oil and gas which Western leaders, if they play their cards right, can exploit to the fullest.

Whatever the motivation, and perhaps it is a mixture of all of the above, it is a peculiar truism that leaders of the West, who were born in London or New York or Paris, seem utterly infatuated with a city several hours flight away, the native language of which they do not speak. After all, President Macron and Prime Minister Starmer do not speak Arabic or Hebrew or Aramaic, while President Donald Trump’s English is barely understandable nowadays. Famously, Mel Gibson's famous 2004 movie ‘The Passion of Christ’ was filmed in Aramaic in order to maintain historical authenticity.

Now that Israel has been set up, what are they “officially” allowed to do?

Once the Western government found a way of fighting the Islamic world, subjugating it in order to exploit the chaos for its own ends, they were hoping that the state of Israel would operate within certain parameters and guidelines, which they had no doubt given it. Happy for a Jewish state to operate as, to all intense and purposes, a Western military base disguised as a nation, the powers that be in the capitals of the Europe were satisfied that they had finally won the Crusades.

But although the relationship is a close one, there are differences between Israel and its masters in Washington and London which do come into the public domain from time to time. For example, the preference of Europe and the United States is that the Israelis subjugate the Palestinians - by extension, the Arabs and by extension, the entire Islamic world - in a very quiet and subtle way using racist laws, ethnic checkpoints to control the physical life of Palestinians and imprisonment or assassination for those who have the temerity to resist the occupation of their ancestral land. The Palestinian Authority, which is a contradiction in terms, has been a key player in this sinister political play, what they used to call in the early 20^th century, ‘The Great Game.’ Mahmoud Abbas’ security forces have regularly arrested Palestinian men from the resistance who only defending their communities against an illegal occupation force: namely the Israeli Army. Additionally, PA military officers have readily handed intelligence over to the Shin Bet (the Israeli equivalent of MI5) and the Mossad (the Israeli equivalent of MI6) and this information has, without question, then been used to assassinate prominent leaders of Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Known to be generally unbribable, murder has usually the weapon of choice against the Islamic-leaning resistance fighters.

Returning to our main point, Western governments did not sign up for this type of televised genocide which we are seeing now. They are not against the genocide based on moral principles but rather, they are worried about the optics. The Western backers of the Zionist entity would, ideally, like Israel to subjugate the Palestinians and the Arabs with skill and with a degree of decorum where their evil deeds are mostly hidden in shadow and are carried out through intelligence operations, nighttime land grabs and assassinations of people who can be easily written off as ‘terrorists’ by the braindead Western media.

But the current Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is not somebody that operates within guidelines that any normal human being can recognise. He is somebody who has essentially gone rogue since October 7^th, a man who sees himself as a messianic figure who will bring in the golden age of the Jew. He is punishing the Arabs for every crime ever committed against a Jew since the word ‘Jew’ entered the vocabulary of the human race. London and Washington cannot control him because he is a deranged individual, and a law unto himself.

The Western military industrial complex does not care, even slightly, about Palestinian children being slaughtered and blown to pieces, and we saw their disregard for human life when a million people were killed in Iraq. They would much prefer that the killings take place away from 4k cameras and preferably in such a manner that they would only be discovered by historians (ideally archaeologists) in decades to come. It was not part of the Western plan that they should have an Israeli Prime Minister in charge of their garrison Judeo-Christian Crusader state in the middle of the Holy Land that would slaughter children live on TV.

And trust me: it is the ‘live on TV’ part of the sentence which is most distressing for Macron and Starmer and not the ‘slaughter children’ part.  

The Bottom Line: Will Britain and in France recognise Palestine in September?

No.

There is about as much chance of this happening as there is of the next Pope being a former member of Hamas whose name is ‘Abdullah bin Vatican.’

The statements of Macron and Starmer this week are nothing to do with Palestinians or Arabs or any sense of justice. They are aimed at the 75-year-old lunatic whose original name was Benjamin Mileikowsky, given that his family are Polish by extraction.

Macron and Starmer are saying: listen, idiot, we gave you that bloody state so we can continue the Crusades! You are going to operate it in a way where we have plausible deniability! We don't mind you killing Palestinians but you cannot do it like this live on television! We are considering declaring a state of Palestine or recognising it if you don't stop acting like a wild dog! Get back on the leash, you piece of sh**!”

What you have seen on your television screen this week is simply a negotiation live on television between Britain, France and Israel because Netanyahu has not listened to anybody in private. His mission is removing every Arab from the entirety of historical Palestine, from the river to the sea.

Starmer, married to a Jewish Zionist, has no issue with this but he is becoming increasingly worried about being indicted for war crimes given how heavily the Royal Air Force have been in supporting the Israeli genocide from their military base in Cyprus, a genocide which has now killed over 60,000 officially and perhaps double that unofficially.

Despite their public statements, Britain and France will not recognise Palestine and go against the ongoing Crusade against the Arab and Islamic world. The call of Pope Urban II in 1095 still echoes through 10 Downing Street and the Elysee Palace today – and anybody who thinks it does not has simply not done the research.

The statements of Macron and Starmer this week were aimed at Netanyahu and had nothing whatsoever to do with actually recognising a fully functioning Palestinian state.

They are not going to give up on their thousand-year-old project just for a few measly Arabs.

Looking for unbiased, fact-based news? Join 1440 today.

Join over 4 million Americans who start their day with 1440 – your daily digest for unbiased, fact-centric news. From politics to sports, we cover it all by analyzing over 100 sources. Our concise, 5-minute read lands in your inbox each morning at no cost. Experience news without the noise; let 1440 help you make up your own mind. Sign up now and invite your friends and family to be part of the informed.

Subscribe to 1440 today.